Rapid patient-specific neural networks for X-ray to volume registration – Nature

Rapid patient-specific neural networks for X-ray to volume registration – Nature


  • Unberath, M. et al. The impact of machine learning on 2D/3D registration for image-guided interventions: a systematic review and perspective. Front. Robot. AI 8, 716007 (2021).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Yip, M. et al. Artificial intelligence meets medical robotics. Science 381, 141–146 (2023).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Penney, G. P. et al. A comparison of similarity measures for use in 2D/3D medical image registration. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 17, 586–595 (1998).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Knaan, D. & Joskowicz, L. Effective intensity-based 2D/3D rigid registration between fluoroscopic X-ray and CT. In Proc. International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention (eds Ellis, R. E. & Peters, T. M.) 351–358 (Springer, 2003).

  • Grupp, R. B. et al. Automatic annotation of hip anatomy in fluoroscopy for robust and efficient 2D/3D registration. Int. J. Comput. Assist. Radiol. Surg. 15, 759–769 (2020).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Grimm, M., Esteban, J., Unberath, M. & Navab, N. Pose-dependent weights and domain randomization for fully automatic X-ray to CT registration. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 40, 2221–2232 (2021).

    Article 
    ADS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahesh, M., Ansari, A. J. & Mettler, F. A. Jr Patient exposure from radiologic and nuclear medicine procedures in the United States and worldwide: 2009–2018. Radiology 307, e221263 (2022).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornelis, F. H., Dzaye, O., Schoellnast, H. & Solomon, S. B. Imaging of interventional therapies in oncology: image guidance, robotics, and fusion systems. In Interventional Oncology (eds Fong, Y. et al.) 1–17 (Springer, 2023).

  • Jhawar, B. S., Mitsis, D. & Duggal, N. Wrong-sided and wrong-level neurosurgery: a national survey. J. Neurosurg. Spine 7, 467–472 (2007).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Tonetti, J., Boudissa, M., Kerschbaumer, G. & Seurat, O. Role of 3D intraoperative imaging in orthopedic and trauma surgery. Orthop. Traumatol. Surg. Res. 106, S19–S25 (2020).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Abumoussa, A. et al. Machine learning for automated and real-time two-dimensional to three-dimensional registration of the spine using a single radiograph. Neurosurg. Focus 54, E16 (2023).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Naik, R. R., Hoblidar, A., Bhat, S. N., Ampar, N. & Kundangar, R. A hybrid 3D-2D image registration framework for pedicle screw trajectory registration between intraoperative X-ray image and preoperative CT image. J. Imaging 8, 185 (2022).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Metz, C. T. et al. Patient specific 4D coronary models from ECG-gated CTA data for intra-operative dynamic alignment of CTA with X-ray images. In Proc. International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention (eds Guang-Zhong, Y. et al.) 369–376 (Springer, 2009).

  • Wagner, M., Schafer, S., Strother, C. & Mistretta, C. 4D interventional device reconstruction from biplane fluoroscopy. Med. Phys. 43, 1324–1334 (2016).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Huynh, E. et al. Artificial intelligence in radiation oncology. Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. 17, 771–781 (2020).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, Y. et al. Telerobotic neurovascular interventions with magnetic manipulation. Sci. Robot. 7, eabg9907 (2022).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Gu, W., Gao, C., Grupp, R., Fotouhi, J. & Unberath, M. Extended capture range of rigid 2D/3D registration by estimating Riemannian pose gradients. In Proc. International Workshop on Machine Learning in Medical Imaging (eds Liu, M. et al.) 281–291 (Springer, 2020).

  • Gopalakrishnan, V. & Golland, P. Fast auto-differentiable digitally reconstructed radiographs for solving inverse problems in intraoperative imaging. In Proc. Workshop on Clinical Image-Based Procedures (eds Chen, Y. et al.) 1–11 (Springer, 2022).

  • Gao, C. et al. A fully differentiable framework for 2D/3D registration and the projective spatial transformers. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 43, 275–285 (2023).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Grupp, R. B. et al. Pose estimation of periacetabular osteotomy fragments with intraoperative X-ray navigation. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 67, 441–452 (2019).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Bier, B. et al. Learning to detect anatomical landmarks of the pelvis in X-rays from arbitrary views. Int. J. Comput. Assist. Radiol. Surg. 14, 1463–1473 (2019).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Shrestha, P., Xie, C., Yoshii, Y. & Kitahara, I. Rayemb: arbitrary landmark detection in X-ray images using ray embedding subspace. In Proc. Asian Conference on Computer Vision (eds Cho, M. et al.) 665–681 (Springer, 2024).

  • Miao, S., Wang, Z. J. & Liao, R. A CNN regression approach for real-time 2D/3D registration. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 35, 1352–1363 (2016).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Bui, M., Albarqouni, S., Schrapp, M., Navab, N. & Ilic, S. X-ray posenet: 6 DoF pose estimation for mobile X-ray devices. In Proc. 2017 IEEE Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV) 1036–1044 (IEEE, 2017).

  • Zhang, B. et al. A patient-specific self-supervised model for automatic X-ray/CT registration. In Proc. International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention (eds Greenspan, H. et al.) 515–524 (Springer, 2023).

  • Gopalakrishnan, V., Dey, N. & Golland, P. Intraoperative 2D/3D image registration via differentiable X-ray rendering. In Proc. IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 11662–11672 (IEEE, 2024).

  • Wasserthal, J. et al. TotalSegmentator: robust segmentation of 104 anatomic structures in CT images. Radiol. Artif. Intell. 5, e230024 (2023).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaus, A. et al. Towards unifying anatomy segmentation: automated generation of a full-body CT dataset. In Proc. 2024 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP) 41–47 (IEEE, 2024).

  • Magnetic Resonance Angiography Atlas Dataset. NeuroImaging Tools & Resources Collaboratory (2017).

  • Liu, P. et al. Deep learning to segment pelvic bones: large-scale CT datasets and baseline models. Int. J. Comput. Assist. Radiol. Surg. 16, 749–756 (2021).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Yushkevich, P. A. et al. Fast automatic segmentation of hippocampal subfields and medial temporal lobe subregions in 3 Tesla and 7 Tesla T2-weighted MRI. Alzheimers Dement. 12, P126–P127 (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, Y., Barnes, C., Lu, J., Yang, J. & Li, H. On the continuity of rotation representations in neural networks. In Proc. IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 5745–5753 (IEEE, 2019).

  • Geist, A. R., Frey, J., Zhobro, M., Levina, A. & Martius, G. Learning with 3D rotations, a hitchhiker’s guide to SO(3). In Proc. 41st International Conference on Machine Learning Vol. 235 (eds Salakhutdinov, R. et al.) 15331–15350 (PMLR, 2024).

  • Lin, C., Hanson, A. J. & Hanson, S. M. Algebraically rigorous quaternion framework for the neural network pose estimation problem. In Proc. IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision 14097–14106 (IEEE, 2023).

  • He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S. & Sun, J. Deep residual learning for image recognition. In Proc. IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 770–778 (IEEE, 2016).

  • Flepp, R. et al. Automatic multi-view X-ray/CT registration using bone substructure contours. Int. J. Comput. Assist. Radiol. Surg. 20, 1401–1408 (2025).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitrović, U., Špiclin, Ž, Likar, B. & Pernuš, F. 3D-2D registration of cerebral angiograms: a method and evaluation on clinical images. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 32, 1550–1563 (2013).

    Article 
    ADS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu, M. et al. VesselBoost: a Python toolbox for small blood vessel segmentation in human magnetic resonance angiography data. Aperture Neuro (2024).

  • Ronneberger, O., Fischer, P. & Brox, T. U-net: convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation. In Proc. International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention (eds Navab, N. et al.) 234–241 (Springer, 2015).

  • Terzakis, G. & Lourakis, M. A consistently fast and globally optimal solution to the perspective-n-point problem. In Proc. European Conference on Computer Vision (eds Vedaldi, A. et al.) 478–494 (Springer, 2020).

  • Potente, M. & Mäkinen, T. Vascular heterogeneity and specialization in development and disease. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 18, 477–494 (2017).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Nuñez, F. B. & Dohna-Schwake, C. Epidemiology, diagnostics, and management of vein of Galen malformation. Pediatr. Neurol. 119, 50–55 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Varghese, C., Harrison, E. M., O’Grady, G. & Topol, E. J. Artificial intelligence in surgery. Nat. Med. 30, 1257–1268 (2024).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Jena, R., Sethi, D., Chaudhari, P. & Gee, J. Deep learning in medical image registration: magic or mirage? In Proc. 38th Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (eds Globerson, A. et al.) 108331–108353 (Curran Associates Inc., 2024).

  • Dey, N. et al. Learning general-purpose biomedical volume representations using randomized synthesis. In Proc. 13th International Conference on Learning Representations (eds Yue, Y. et al.) (ICLR, 2025).

  • Gagoski, B. et al. Automated detection and reacquisition of motion-degraded images in fetal HASTE imaging at 3T. Magn. Reson. Med. 87, 1914–1922 (2022).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Arsigny, V., Commowick, O., Ayache, N. & Pennec, X. A fast and log-euclidean polyaffine framework for locally linear registration. J. Math. Imaging Vis. 33, 222–238 (2009).

    Article 
    MathSciNet 

    Google Scholar 

  • Gopalakrishnan, V., Dey, N. & Golland, P. PolyPose: deformable 2D/3D registration via polyrigid transformations. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 60633–60659 (NeurIPS, 2025).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartley, R. & Zisserman, A. Multiple View Geometry in Computer Vision (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2003).

  • Swinehart, D. F. The Beer-Lambert law. J. Chem. Educ. 39, 333 (1962).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Siddon, R. L. Fast calculation of the exact radiological path for a three-dimensional CT array. Med. Phys. 12, 252–255 (1985).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Unberath, M. et al. DeepDRR—a catalyst for machine learning in fluoroscopy-guided procedures. In Proc. International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention (eds Frangi, A. F. et al.) 98–106 (Springer, 2018).

  • Milletari, F., Navab, N. & Ahmadi, S.-A. V-net: fully convolutional neural networks for volumetric medical image segmentation. In Proc. 2016 Fourth International Conference on 3D Vision (3DV) 565–571 (IEEE, 2016).

  • Grupp, R. B., Armand, M. & Taylor, R. H. Patch-based image similarity for intraoperative 2D/3D pelvis registration during periacetabular osteotomy. In Proc. International Workshop on Computer-Assisted and Robotic Endoscopy 153–163 (Springer, 2018).

  • Ferrara, D. et al. Sharing a whole-/total-body [18F] FDG-PET/CT dataset with CT-derived segmentations: an ENHANCE.PET initiative. Sci. Data 13, 869 (2026).

  • Sundar, L. K. S. et al. Fully automated, semantic segmentation of whole-body 18F-FDG PET/CT images based on data-centric artificial intelligence. J. Nucl. Med. 63, 1941–1948 (2022).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Grupp, R. et al. Data and code associated with the publication: Automatic annotation of hip anatomy in fluoroscopy for robust and efficient 2D/3D registration. Johns Hopkins Research Data Repository (2020).

  • Flepp, R. et al. Automatic multi-View X-Ray/CT registration using bone substructure contours. Zenodo (2025).

  • Mitrović, U. & Špiclin, Ž. Gold standard for 3D-2D registration of cerebral angiograms. Laboratory of Imaging Technologies (2013).

  • Pengbo, L. et al. CTPelvic1K Dataset. Zenodo (2020).

  • Wasserthal, J. Dataset with segmentations of 117 important anatomical structures in 1228 CT images. Zenodo (2023).

  • Ferrara, D. et al. ENHANCE.PET 1.6k: a whole-/total-body [18F]FDG-PET/CT dataset with CT-derived segmentations. Science Data Bank (2026).

  • Paszke, A. et al. PyTorch: an imperative style, high-performance deep learning library. In Proc. 33rd International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (eds Wallach, H. M. et al.) 8026–8037 (Curran Associates Inc., 2019).

  • Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    《Widows Bay》 馬修瑞斯(Matthew Rhys) 2026年艾美獎得獎者 艾美獎得獎者 《Widow's Bay》 《The Beast in Me》 艾美獎 2026年艾美獎得獎者 2026年艾美獎 艾美獎 艾美獎 2026年艾美獎得獎名單 2026年艾美獎 2026年艾美獎得獎者 凱特·奧弗林(Kate O'Flynn) 艾美獎得獎者 凱蒂·迪波德(Katie Dippold) 艾美獎 2026年艾美獎 《Widows Bay》演員陣容 2026年艾美獎 2026年艾美獎提名者 2026年艾美獎得獎者 哪裡觀看艾美獎 艾美獎 2026年艾美獎提名 艾美獎何時舉行 2026年艾美獎何時舉行 2026年艾美獎得獎名單 2026年艾美獎 什麼是艾美獎 誰贏得了2026年艾美獎